additive_combination Tactic #
In this file, the additive_combination
tactic is created. This tactic, which
works over AddGroup
s, attempts to simplify the target by creating a additive combination
of a list of equalities and subtracting it from the target. This file also includes a
definition for additive_combination_config
. A additive_combination_config
object can be passed into the tactic, allowing the user to specify a
normalization tactic.
Implementation Notes #
This tactic works by creating a weighted sum of the given equations with the given coefficients. Then, it subtracts the right side of the weighted sum from the left side so that the right side equals 0, and it does the same with the target. Afterwards, it sets the goal to be the equality between the lefthand side of the new goal and the lefthand side of the new weighted sum. Lastly, calls a normalization tactic on this target.
References #
Performs macro expansion of a additive combination expression,
using +
/-
/*
//
on equations and values.
.proof p
means thatp
is a syntax corresponding to a proof of an equation. For example, ifh : a = b
thenexpandAdditiveCombo (2 • h)
returns.proof (c_add_pf 2 h)
which is a proof of2 • a = 2 • b
..const c
means that the input expression is not an equation but a value.
Implementation of additive_combination
and additive_combination2
.
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.
Instances For
additive_combination
attempts to simplify the target by creating a additive combination
of a list of equalities and subtracting it from the target.
The tactic will create a additive
combination by adding the equalities together from left to right, so the order
of the input hypotheses does matter. If the normalize
field of the
configuration is set to false, then the tactic will simply set the user up to
prove their target using the additive combination instead of normalizing the subtraction.
Note: The left and right sides of all the equalities should have the same
type, and the coefficients should also have this type. There must be
instances of Mul
and AddGroup
for this type.
- The input
e
inadditive_combination e
is a additive combination of proofs of equalities, given as a sum/difference of coefficients multiplied by expressions. The coefficients may be arbitrary expressions. The expressions can be arbitrary proof terms proving equalities. Most commonly they are hypothesis namesh1, h2, ...
. additive_combination (norm := tac) e
runs the "normalization tactic"tac
on the subgoal(s) after constructing the additive combination.- The default normalization tactic is
abel
, which closes the goal or fails. - To avoid normalization entirely, use
skip
as the normalization tactic.
- The default normalization tactic is
additive_combination (exp := n) e
will take the goal to then
th power before subtracting the combinatione
. In other words, if the goal ist1 = t2
,additive_combination (exp := n) e
will change the goal to(t1 - t2)^n = 0
before proceeding as above. This feature is not supported foradditive_combination2
.
Example Usage:
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : x*y + 2*x = 1) (h2 : x = y) : x*y = -2*y + 1 := by
additive_combination 1*h1 - 2*h2
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : x*y + 2*x = 1) (h2 : x = y) : x*y = -2*y + 1 := by
additive_combination h1 - 2*h2
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : x*y + 2*x = 1) (h2 : x = y) : x*y = -2*y + 1 := by
additive_combination (norm := ring_nf) -2*h2
/- Goal: x * y + x * 2 - 1 = 0 -/
example (x y z : ℝ) (ha : x + 2*y - z = 4) (hb : 2*x + y + z = -2)
(hc : x + 2*y + z = 2) :
-3*x - 3*y - 4*z = 2 := by
additive_combination ha - hb - 2*hc
example (x y : ℚ) (h1 : x + y = 3) (h2 : 3*x = 7) :
x*x*y + y*x*y + 6*x = 3*x*y + 14 := by
additive_combination x*y*h1 + 2*h2
example (x y : ℤ) (h1 : x = -3) (h2 : y = 10) : 2*x = -6 := by
additive_combination (norm := skip) 2*h1
simp
axiom qc : ℚ
axiom hqc : qc = 2*qc
example (a b : ℚ) (h : ∀ p q : ℚ, p = q) : 3*a + qc = 3*b + 2*qc := by
additive_combination 3 * h a b + hqc
Equations
- One or more equations did not get rendered due to their size.